Posts Tagged power

Hills vs. Rolling Hills

le Marche - passeggiando in biciclettaNot all hills are created equal. That’s what I’ve learned in the past week. Ever since the monstrous hills on the Oceanside course, I keep thinking to myself why I had so much trouble with them. I’ve trained on hills for the past year, climbing at least 2,000 feet each time I go over 40 miles. I would even venture to say that hill climbing was one of my strengths. So why did those damn hills take so much out of me (and if you know me personally, you know I’m not going to let that happen again)?

Then it hit me yesterday. As I resume my training regimen, I’ve decided to focus a lot on hills for both my bike and run. I figure that hills develop leg strength, and they also push your anaerobic threshold, so when I’m not building my base, why not build my power. I’ve been riding San Joaquin Hills, which is about a 4 mile trek from the back bay to newport coast. The thing about it is that there’s barely zero downhill in the entire climb. It does level out at points, but leveling is very different than going downhill. It’s 4 miles of a fairly stead upgrade, with some serious 10% grades, a lot of gradual 4-6% grades, and very few flat areas.

This is different than Pacific Coast Highway, which is a series of ups and downs, AKA rolling hills. With rollings hills, you build momentum going down a hill and into the upswing, and the real challenge isn’t until you’re about halfway up, sometimes more sometimes less depending on the length of the hills. Well, I realized I’m good on rolling hills. I can attack the upswing and I’ve learned to actually attack the downhill too in order to get a few more MPHs out of it. However, I suck at well, hills.

Hills don’t have the benefit of having significant momentum going into it. Yes, you can ride fast on a flat into an uphill, but it’s different. My guess would be that you have 50% more speed going on a downhill than on a flat. That’s quite a bit more momentum. Plus, what’s killer is that in some hills, it goes up, then flat, then up, then up a little steeper. You never get to chill, so the heart rate stays high, the lactic acid builds, and it hurts. At one point of the 10% grade hill yesterday (into the wind on a windy day), I thought my heart was going to bounce out of my chest. And then how was I rewarded by completing that 10% grade, a 10 meter flat across a street and then an 8% grade.

I’m not complaining, I’m just distinguishing. If you think you’re training on hills and you’re doing rolling hills, then trust me, it’s very different. The challenge is signficantly harder and I recommend finding hills that just go on and on without declines if you want to get better. I was awesome on rolling hills, which I originally thought were hills, but I learned the hard way in Oceanside. When studying elevation charts for a race, keep in mind the descent before an ascent. If you don’t see one, then that climb is going to be much harder. Not all climbs are created equal, so 2500 feet of ascent on one course could be very different than 2500 feet on another. Study what comes before those hills. Also study the length of the incline. Climbing 200 feet in .3 miles versus 1 mile is VERY different. Think grade %. That’s the difference of a 5-7% grade versus a 12-14% grade (roughly).

So back to my workouts…I’ve been ambitious the last two weekends, hoping I could handle San Joaquin, chill down Newport Coast and then PCH to Laguna, then climb back Newport Coast (1.5 miles of 5-7% grade with no give). I haven’t been able to get my psyche up to go back up Newport. In time I guess…I did add hill sprints this past weekend though, which are 30 seconds bursts up a 12-14% grade, then back down and all over again. This was actually great work. It really teaches you power. Now I just need to turn those into 1 minute bursts.

Anyone else hill training? How is it going?

By the way, some random training pics from this week…i’m wearing some SHORT SHORTS, but man they are comfortable.

  • Share/Bookmark

, , , , , ,

No Comments

Training is really a science

bridge runnersI’m pretty amazed at how much science there is in training. I’ve been reading several training books over the past few weeks, using Joe Friel’s The Triathlete’s Training Bible as my main source for coming up with a training schedule for the next 62 weeks (post marathon October 25th to end of 2010).

Given the races I want to complete, this requires careful planning. I want to race these events, not just finish, which changes the tone of training. Friel breaks out his swim, biking, running into endurance, force and speed skills as well as muscular endurance, anaerobic endurance, and power. Think of this like a triangle with the 3 points being endurance, force and speed, with muscular endurance connecting endurance/force, anaerobic endurance connecting speed and endurance, and power connecting speed/force.

This sounds complicated, but when you start thinking about training in these dimensions, it’s very quick to see where you need help and how certain workouts that target these applications can really improve your times. If you just want to finish, this doesn’t matter. If you want to improve your times, this is critical.

So far, I’ve started developing my weekly schedule for next year, and I plan on training for about 700 hours next year, racing in three marathons, two half marathons, a couple 5ks, a half ironman, an ironman, and 3-4 olympic/sprint triathlons. Yes it sounds like a lot, but several of these races will be lower priority that I will use as training for the main events, AKA A priority races.

The other components on top of developing this triangle are nutrition, rest, and technique, particularly when it comes to swimming. As I mentioned in my previous post, I’ve started working on my swimming technique with total immersion swimming drills. Although I’ve only spent about 2.5 hours in the pool doing these drills, I can already feel the improvement. I do need to improve my breathing technique though as I’m way too tired from poor breathing!

I’ll keep you posted on my schedule as I come up with it. I’d be happy to entertain any questions you have on schedules…although I’m not an expert, I’m learning a lot, quickly.

  • Share/Bookmark

, , , , , , , ,

No Comments

money: how important is it to you?

Dollars !I’ve noticed that a lot of people I know have an obsession with money. I see it in two forms: buy material things or hoard.  I understand we need money to survive. But what about this need to accumulate wealth?

I ask this because I have fallen (note past tense, thankfully) into this camp before. I have hoarded money. I avoid spending to “save for a rainy day”. But when is that rainy day? Is it death? Is it if I’m paralyzed? I mean seriously, at that point, who cares about comfort…I’m paralyzed.

I’m sure there are numerous psychological studies on this. Maybe people came from a poor background and feel a need for financial security. What is it about money that makes us comfortable? Is it just another “thing” that gives us security? Do some people find comfort in relationships or something other than money, maybe love (friendly or deeper)? Does everyone have a dependence on something for some reason, and for some people, it just happens to be money?

A friend of mine won’t turn the air conditioner on in his car because he feels like it costs money. He says it uses too much gas. So if people are hot, they have to roll down the windows. I do the math in my head. Spend $30 to fill up a tank. Let’s just say you did that every week, so your cost was about $1500 a year. What if you had to fill up ONE MORE TIME? You’d spend $1530. So the $30 ANNUALLY wasn’t worth the additional comfort of having a cool car when it’s hot as hell outside? I don’t get it. Then again, maybe my brain is just wired to do cost/benefit analysis for even the most trivial things.

Maybe we’re irrational because of what money represents (e.g. Power, Status, etc…). And it’s so strange too because it’s usually the people who have a lot of money that care so much about it. Of course people without money want to make more, but they’re doing it at the subsistence level to eat, stay warm, and have shelter. People with money who do things like keep the AC off in the car easily have enough to afford it. So what is it that makes someone want to save that $.60 per week? What causes this?

Deeper questions and I’m sure there’s no right answer. I also feel this represents a minority of the population, but a minority that I find often in the business world.

  • Share/Bookmark

, , , , , , , ,

3 Comments