Posts Tagged speed
Pedaling – yes, even that has science to it
Posted by Adam Ainbinder in Cycling, Ironman Training, Training Tips on November 6, 2009
Physics does fall into the realm of science, right? For those of you who take cycling seriously, I don’t have to convince you that there is a lot you can do with your pedaling to improve your force, and therefore, speed. For those who do not cycle, I think you’d be surprised how much physics there is in pedaling. One of my themes for this winter is to get faster on the bike (along with endure the swim and run on the forefoot), and so I want to study the pieces to the biking puzzle. No better place to start with the simple motion we learned when we were three years old.
I came across this website, and they have this great article on pedaling. I knew there was something to pedaling – something more then getting into a fairly uncomfortable seat, bending in a strange position for several hours, and just pushing DOWN as hard as I can on these tiny little pedals. Well, striking down is exactly where I was doing wrong.
The article’s main point is that the additional leverage you get by striking forward and down (think 45 degree angle) is MUCH more powerful than striking down. It sounds confusing, but check out the diagrams in the article. Read it over a few times because I definitely had to study the diagrams to get a better understanding of what the author meant with additional distance / force from more leverage. You have a longer length to push when you use your pedals this way, which gives you more time to generate power. That’s why longer crank shafts give you more leverage and can generate more power.
The other key takeaway from the article was the pull up in the back half of the pedal (the part where you’re clipped in and the force of the pedal pulls your leg up – yeah, that’s NOT how it’s supposed to work). The article says your leg weighs about 15 pounds, and if you’re not pulling your leg up, then your other leg has to compensate for that on the push forward/down, meaning you have to overcome 15 pounds just to get to the zero power threshold. If you’ve heard of trying to make your leg feel weightless, this is what the article is talking about. You should at a minimum be pulling up your leg so that your other leg doesn’t have to work for that.
In addition, the area from 2 o clock to 7 o clock is a key area of power output. Here, the leg should almost be straight, and the feeling should be like wiping dirt/gum off the bottom of your shoe. Surprisingly, this swipe of the foot will account for about 25% of your power output. Crazy huh?
To summarize, here’s how your power breaks down:
- 65% on the downward push
- 25% on the swipe from the bottom to the beginning of the backswing
- 10% of the pull up (and mostly just to offset the weight of a free leg)
So how do you work on this? This is what I’m going to do
- One legged drills on an indoor trainer – get the feelings/leg positions right. The feeling should be smooth without jerkiness
- One legged drills while riding, but leave the other foot clipped in and just make it feel limp. In this position, don’t get jerky – it’s so easy to do
- Simulate the feeling in 2-3 mile intervals with both feet. In one interval, focus on the downward push with both feet. In another interval, focus on the scraping off gum feeling. In another interval, pull your leg up. The key is putting these all together, which is where the one legged riding comes in
If you know of any other good cycling articles, pass them on! I hope this one helps you get faster on the bike.
Solving the heart rate zone conundrum
Posted by Adam Ainbinder in Heart Rate Monitoring, Ironman Training, Training Tips on September 16, 2009
How many of you feel comfortable with heart rate zones and what they mean? I know most of the serious athletes following this blog use some sort of heart rate monitor (i love my Garmin), and I’m curious how many of you use the zones that nearly all training books suggest. I want to uncover the mysteries around heart rate zones with you, so please help / correct any of the below comments.
Heart rate zones matter for the type of training (see training types in my earlier post) you’re trying to improve, whether its speed, force, endurance, etc… You want to spend time in the appropriate zone for different skills you’re working on, and several workouts take you from zone to zone to work to develop different types of fitness. The key first step in determining your zones is to figure out your max heart rate (MHR). You can spend a lot of money on a VO2 test, but how different could it be from plugging some values into the formulas found here. These formulas are:
MHR = 220 – Age (simple)
MHR = 206.3 – (0.711 × Age)
MHR = 217 – (0.85 x Age)
MHR = 206.9 – (0.67 x age)
After solving the formulas, I found my heart rate to be somewhere between 185 and 195, and I chose 190 as my max heart rate (i think Lance Armstrong’s tested near 210, which is nuts – learned that at the cadaver exhibit on the heart in LA).
Once you have your max heart rate, you can determine your lactate, or anaerobic, threshold, which is the rate at which your muscles release hydrogen ions into the blood stream, causing that burning feeling in your legs. Your body releases these faster then it processes them out. Your lactate threshold is about 90% of your maximum heart rate. For me, this is 90% * 190 = 171. Sidebar: interval training is meant to push your body past your lactate threshold for a brief moment, then give you recovery time so your blood can process the lactate out before starting the next interval.
Are you starting to see why these zones are important?
So having these two numbers is key. The next step requires looking up these zones in a heart rate table based on either your maximum heart rate or lactate threshold heart rate (different tables ask for different numbers). I use Joe Friel’s table in the triathlete’s training bible, and a description of his zones and figuring out this threshold is listed here. Here are my heart rate zone’s based on this info (running first, then cycling):
Zone 1-Recovery: 113-145, 112-139
Zone 2-Extensive endurance: 146-156, 140-152
Zone 3-Intensive endurance: 157-163, 163-160
Zone 4-Subthreshold: 164-170, 161-170
Zone 5a-Super threshold: 171-174, same for cycling
Zone 5b-Anaerobic capacity: 175-180, same for cycling
Zone 5c-power: 181-189, same for cycling
So I’ll use these zones to design my workouts, particularly my long runs (zone 1 and 2), my tempos (a mix of zones), and my intervals – pushing into zone 5.
Any questions? Comments? Feedback?
Training is really a science
Posted by Adam Ainbinder in Goals, Ironman Training, Training Tips on September 13, 2009
I’m pretty amazed at how much science there is in training. I’ve been reading several training books over the past few weeks, using Joe Friel’s The Triathlete’s Training Bible as my main source for coming up with a training schedule for the next 62 weeks (post marathon October 25th to end of 2010).
Given the races I want to complete, this requires careful planning. I want to race these events, not just finish, which changes the tone of training. Friel breaks out his swim, biking, running into endurance, force and speed skills as well as muscular endurance, anaerobic endurance, and power. Think of this like a triangle with the 3 points being endurance, force and speed, with muscular endurance connecting endurance/force, anaerobic endurance connecting speed and endurance, and power connecting speed/force.
This sounds complicated, but when you start thinking about training in these dimensions, it’s very quick to see where you need help and how certain workouts that target these applications can really improve your times. If you just want to finish, this doesn’t matter. If you want to improve your times, this is critical.
So far, I’ve started developing my weekly schedule for next year, and I plan on training for about 700 hours next year, racing in three marathons, two half marathons, a couple 5ks, a half ironman, an ironman, and 3-4 olympic/sprint triathlons. Yes it sounds like a lot, but several of these races will be lower priority that I will use as training for the main events, AKA A priority races.
The other components on top of developing this triangle are nutrition, rest, and technique, particularly when it comes to swimming. As I mentioned in my previous post, I’ve started working on my swimming technique with total immersion swimming drills. Although I’ve only spent about 2.5 hours in the pool doing these drills, I can already feel the improvement. I do need to improve my breathing technique though as I’m way too tired from poor breathing!
I’ll keep you posted on my schedule as I come up with it. I’d be happy to entertain any questions you have on schedules…although I’m not an expert, I’m learning a lot, quickly.














